|
|
Post by Grecian on May 5, 2013 21:58:07 GMT 2
Spit or Swallow?
Vaginal or BJ?....when you are in a rush...
Foreskin or Roundhead?
Large or Small Labia?
Hairy or Shaved Bush?
Small but girthy or long and thin?
DDD or AAA Breasts?
Finger in your Vagina or finger in your arse or finger in your mouth - as you Cum?...
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on May 5, 2013 22:01:37 GMT 2
OP First!
Neither..If I could reach then defo' Spit!
Both..
Roundhead
Large...
Hairy...
GAG!
Both are fine - tending towards large breasts, these days....
Mouth is good; arse is a treat!
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on May 6, 2013 21:33:33 GMT 2
Feck me! 9 views and only my reply?
Lift up your skirts and part your undies, Laydees, and give it your best shot...I don't even care if you lie!
|
|
|
|
Post by pepecura on May 7, 2013 22:38:41 GMT 2
I am sorry, i cant post here because of the fucking new proboards rule...NO ADULT CONTENT.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on May 8, 2013 20:11:49 GMT 2
That is the reason why I posted this shite on Flushed!!
(That, and I can't post above, natch!...)
Great pictures that you posted above, by the way!
|
|
|
|
Post by gnd on Jun 7, 2013 19:37:29 GMT 2
ah. just realized why you changed your avatar.
BTW, why do some women freak out about a guy´s cock being circumcised or not--wtf does it matter. Really--do these women see an uncircumcised cock coming at them, and actually choose to not have sex of any type because of it?!
discuss.
|
|
|
|
Post by Tilly Star on Jun 8, 2013 16:56:08 GMT 2
Most men in UK are uncircumcised, more rare to find one that is.
|
|
|
|
Post by ninchursanga on Jun 8, 2013 17:42:40 GMT 2
For some strange reason I've encountered more circumcised men than uncircumcised men. Never heard that women are freaked out by a circumcised c*ck, I've always thought that there is this myth about circumcised men that they're supposed to last longer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on Jun 8, 2013 21:31:10 GMT 2
How can that possibly be the case?
Think about it before answering...
|
|
|
|
Post by ninchursanga on Jun 10, 2013 4:20:34 GMT 2
I thought about answering before I posted cause I remembered an interview I listened to on the Swiss Radio, several weeks ago. It was a Jewish Swiss writer who talked about how he always got easily laid cause being Jewish all the girls were intrigued by the fact that he was circumcised.
Kind of like they never had chocolate ice-cream, but have heard lots about it and can't wait to try it.
Get it or is that above your capacities?
Also, I draw on my own experiences and the questions I've gotten from female friends. All in the manner of "So tell me is it really true that....(insert whatever stereotype you may have about circumcised men)?"
Plus, I lived in Turkey and being a female foreigner, the circumcision thingie and its effect on male sexual performance was talked about regularly amongst the foreign female crowd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on Jun 10, 2013 20:51:41 GMT 2
Well that Jewish/Swiss writer sounds like a right To55er to begin with!
So you are a Laydee??!! I never knew that...
I suppose it all comes(!) down to where the sensitive areas are on a Standard Penis...
I would have thought that the covering of skin would subdue the sensation a tad?
|
|
|
|
Post by ninchursanga on Jun 10, 2013 22:44:34 GMT 2
I would have thought that the covering of skin would subdue the sensation a tad? You'd have to ask a circumcised lad. IMHO it's all talk and myth, never noticed a significant difference but I'm just the consumer. |
|
|
|
Post by gnd on Jun 11, 2013 15:05:43 GMT 2
I´m not Jewish but I thought all Jewish guys were circumcised; and that most American males (though this is changing) were also circumcised. I didn´t grow up knowing any other option existed, and culturally when I did thought it bizarre...til living abroad for so long where it is usual for males to not be circumcised (where I lived at least). When I gave birth to my first child in the US in the 80s in Manhattan, if she had been a boy, the hospital would have automatically circumcised a boy (!). So when I gave birth in Norway, I was so adamant that every nurse and doctor knew I did NOT want that for our son--then learned it was the opposite, they automatically did not circumcise boys, and pretty much would not even if I had asked/demanded.
---
Not being a guy, I personally could be wrong, but seems logical that an uncircumcised which has skin that covers the penis, would be more sensitive when exposed, compared to a circumcised penis which is always exposed to fabric, clothing etc. Either way, both are sexy, and neither would be a reason to not have sex, or date someone. I find that so bizarre, and only even knew women felt that way from comments on TT , the Stew (a few in the last months even) etc, and online after having a look from curiosity from the TT comments.
---
I know that if I don´t shave or wax my nether regions and grow it out bushy, that when I do finally shave/wax it´s very sensitive:). Though, it´s certainly not as if a boy has a choice, when his parents choose to have him circumcised; also why I think it is bizarre any female would put that as a criterion for fucking someone, or dating someone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on Jun 11, 2013 20:17:35 GMT 2
You ever seen an un circumsized Penis?
the foreskin covers the glans - you can tell I am a Doctor! - but when retracted, the whole lot is exposed! Just what do they snip off then??
So you equate Circumcision on a Male to be the same as shaving your Minge/Vag/Labs etc??
I'd certainly rather have my Bollocks shaved than go through either of the 4 following preceedures!
"The WHO offers four classifications of Female Genital Mutilation. Type I usually refers to removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy) and clitoral hood.
Type II (excision) is removal of the clitoris and inner labia.
Type III (infibulation) involves the removal of all or part of the inner and outer labia, and usually the clitoris, and the fusion of the wound; a small hole is left for the passage of urine and menstrual blood, and the wound is opened for intercourse and childbirth.
Around 85 percent of women who undergo FGM experience Types I and II. Type III is the most common procedure in Djibouti, Somalia and Sudan, and in parts of Eritrea, Ethiopia and Mali.
Type IV refers to miscellaneous procedures such as symbolic piercing of the clitoris or labia, cauterization of the clitoris, and cutting into the vagina to widen it (gishiri cutting).
|
|
|
|
Post by gnd on Jun 12, 2013 20:48:38 GMT 2
yes, both.And no, absolutely do not equate shaving hair equates with a removal of part of a male´s penis! No no no, just equating it with the exposure sensation. I equate circumcision to female genital mutilation. Hence, why when I did realize there is a choice, I would not choose that for our son(s), as there is imho absolutely no reason to do so, religious or otherwise, that is justified.
So sorry if it seemed I was making light of it. I think it´s horrible, and don´t think it should be done. Especially worse older boys, no anesthesia etc.
|
|
|
|
Post by gnd on Jun 12, 2013 20:50:29 GMT 2
and just to clarify, obv I think FGM in all forms/types is horrible too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on Jun 12, 2013 20:52:35 GMT 2
I hear what you say but even if you accept Male circumcision to any extent; the Female version sounds horrific....
I've still got my foreskin intact and it doubles as a 'Man Bag'....Keys, fags, wallet are normally stored in there when I go out...
|
|
|
|
Post by gnd on Jun 13, 2013 19:56:11 GMT 2
lmao gawd at your second comment!,)
----
Serious, the first comment, agree, and especially the circumstances, age, unclean "instruments" whatever they find to use, etc. Sorry, totally ruined your light hearted fun post. will try to keep it more flushed in future:)
|
|
|
|
Post by Grecian on Jun 15, 2013 19:20:10 GMT 2
I've forgotten what the question was!
|
|
